Law stipulating public hearing required for constitutional appointments
Syed Manzurul Islam: The criteria included proficient effectiveness, genuineness, fitness, comprehension and experience about the decision framework et cetera. As an individual from the common society myself, and since there were three common society agents on the rundown of 10, I had trusted that no less than one would discover put in the decision commission. I had trusted that a scholarly or educationist would be welcome to join the decision commission. Regulatory effectiveness alone is insufficient to lead any race tastefully. There must be an intense attention to the quick and dirty of the decision procedure, its setbacks, and the impact of cash, power, and so on. It is essential to have the ability to hold chats with the political gatherings, to have their trust. This was a chance to guarantee all that. I would have been cheerful if that came to fruition. Open hirelings are incorporated into the commission out of the observation that their regulatory abilities are fundamental.
Prothom Alo: If regulatory expertise is the benchmark, how are judges experienced in running the organization? There is a general observation in the nation that the judges too comprehend organization, yet educationists and others don't - What do you think?
Syed Manzurul Islam: Maybe the discernment that general society workers can run the decision commission well is on the grounds that they have involvement with field level. We should split far from such a discernment. On the off chance that the race commission is to perform effectively as a group, then its individuals must be chosen from different callings. This could be reflected if a law was drawn up for the decision commission.
Prothom Alo: Four names were chosen from the Awami Class and BNP records. So from which little gatherings were the names of the staying six taken?
Syed Manzurul Islam: LDP, JSD, BNF, Islami Oikya Jote, Bangladesh Tarikat Organization, and so on. I proposed one of the names. The littler gatherings really were the greater part. Maybe it was only an occurrence that a portion of the names were normal. The name of the recently named boss decision magistrate (CEC) originated from seven or eight gatherings and Ali Imam Majumdar's name from two gatherings.
Prothom Alo: Why were the political gatherings' rundowns given need? The past hunt board of trustees uncovered 10 names before giving them over to the president. Why was this not done this time? You were given 10 working days. What was the scurry for you to submit the names two working days early?
Syed Manzurul Islam: The political gatherings were given need since they speak to the general population. Were the names of 10 people distributed last time before accommodation to the president? I think the bureau secretary uncovered these to the media after they were given to the president. This time the names were uncovered inside three hours or somewhere in the vicinity. The 10 working days would end on 7 February. The names were to be submitted to the president on that date, however we submitted them on 6 February since he would be occupied on the seventh. Our work was finished at the 6 February meeting.
Prothom Alo: Why did the inquiry advisory group want to counsel famous natives? What was the explanation behind not tolerating teacher Serajul Islam Chowdhury's suggestion for remarking on the chosen people?
Syed Manzurul Islam: The famous nationals gave their recommendations about how the decision commission ought to be, what capabilities the individuals ought to have et cetera. The decision commission must remember their recommendations and do their obligations. They will be under this ethical commitment. Educator Serajul Islam Chowdhury's suggestion was phenomenal. Yet, we were informed that a considerable lot of the political gatherings did not need that the names they proposed be distributed. Sir's proposal could have been obliged in an unexpected way, by not saying which party had chosen the names. This would give scope for open verbal confrontation. It would likewise have created political disturbance. Having said that, the reality remains it wasn't in the extent of the hunt council to do as such.
Prothom Alo: Why no individuals from the minority were incorporated despite the fact that around 17 people were welcomed? There is no in the commission either.
Syed Manzurul Islam: We had at first thought a couple of prominent people from Dhaka and outside Dhaka would be called. There were two such people, from Chittagong and Rajshahi, however it would not be workable for them to come to Dhaka inside that brief timeframe to go to the meeting. Two ought to have been welcomed from Dhaka rather, yet this was not done because of our carelessness. I apologize for this. A few names cropped up for incorporation in the decision commission, however were not chosen.
Prothom Alo: What incited all of you to prescribe to the president that a law be drawn up for the race commission?
Syed Manzurul Islam: There are sure evident advantages of having a law set up. Firstly, it will have all principles and controls, extension and technique for work plainly articulated, making it simple to take after and execute. Also, it is reasonable in light of the fact that a law is over any individual or gathering. Thirdly, there is a sure commitment to take after the law. There are arrangements and punishments for infringement of the law. With a law set up, the whole decision will have straightforwardness and responsibility. Everybody is requiring a law on the grounds that there is a requirement for it. BNP and numerous different gatherings had recommended names for the inquiry advisory group, yet none of those were chosen. This irritated them. With a law set up, this wouldn't have happened. Had the individuals been chosen from individuals from the decision party and the resistance, then the board would have been worthy to all. There would have been an agreement in framing the commission as well.
Prothom Alo: As an educationist, do you surmise that the procedure all of you used to choose people ought to be utilized for the arrangement to every single protected post?
Syed Manzurul Islam: Surely. There must be particular laws for each established arrangement. That will make the arrangement procedure straightforward and in addition guarantee the matter of responsibility.
Prothom Alo: What was the support behind the board of trustees' agreement to look after mystery? The board of trustees must take after the predominant laws. The privilege to data demonstration of 2009 does not bolster such a stand. So you have damaged the law. What might you say to that?
Syed Manzurul Islam: We didn't consider keeping up mystery in the way you have proposed. We needed to keep the talks inside ourselves until the assignment was finished and that the media would be informed day by day. We felt since the determination of names was a proceeding with process, there may be extent of misconception if talked about. What's more, since the gatherings kept their rundown of names mystery, we did as well. I don't believe that abused the privilege to data act. In any case, if there was a race commission law set up and arrangements with respect to the hunt board of trustees, then the matter of mystery could be obviously determined.
Prothom Alo: All of you abstained from coming specifically before the general population by delegating a representative. Secretarial help doesn't involve an administration representative for a free advisory group.
Syed Manzurul Islam: The inquiry council would settle what the bureau secretary would state toward the finish of the gatherings. He didn't include anything of his own or stray from our mandates. He didn't go about as an administration representative, yet as a representative for the hunt advisory group. In the event that I had the part, I would have given a similar data to the media.
Prothom Alo: In the event that all of you held a hearing, the matter would have been more straightforward. There would be degree to voice assertions against the new CEC and for him to safeguard himself against allegations of his being a piece of the 'Janatar Mancha'. What might you prescribe to maintain a strategic distance from such circumstances? England and India publicize for applications to protected posts. What would it be a good idea for us to do?
Syed Manzurul Islam: I just have one suggestion – let there be a decision commission law. That law may incorporate arrangement for open hearing and different gadgets. We can go the England or India way, however is our political culture of that high a standard? Do the gathering have popular government inside themselves? Do they have duty or regard towards the constitution? The Indian president is of Congress, the head administrator of BJP. However they are politically performing together. Is this possible in our nation? Just when this is possible will the matter of straightforwardness in established arrangements be substantial.
Prothom Alo: What remarks do you have about the new race commission?
Syed Manzurul Islam: I would ask for the new decision commission to place need on winning the certainty of all political gatherings. They can draw up a 100-day plan and start chipping away at it quickly. The arrangement ought to incorporate exchange with the political gatherings, making the matter of straightforwardness and responsibility clear and giving rules to its usage. They ought to have consistent gatherings with people experienced in race undertakings. They ought to keep the general population upgraded about their exercises through the media and have particular responsibilities to guarantee every last race is reasonable and straightforward. The common society and the general population expect this from them. This must be the main impetus behind every one of their exercises.
Prothom Alo: Bless your heart.
Syed Manzurul Islam: Bless your heart.
Comments
Post a Comment